In this section6 sections
What care covers, and what it does not
Routine care keeps a working website working: platform and plugin updates, backups, hosting, SSL, domain renewals, monitoring of the parts your business depends on, and fixes to what we maintain. It is priced by what the site depends on rather than by a bank of hours, because a brochure site and a site that takes bookings carry very different work.
Just as important is what care is not. Redesigns, search programmes, new features and large content projects are separate pieces of work with their own scope and price. An arrangement that quietly absorbs them ends up rationing them later, so we keep the line clear from the start.
The table below shows how three common care tasks run, using an invented example rather than a client: a service business with an enquiry form whose messages go out through an external email service. The site owner approves content and holds the renewal access; the support lead does the checks.
| Task | Who acts | What happens | What would stop it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Review dependencies and access | Site owner with support lead | List the domain, hosting, form delivery and renewal owners, and record every gap | A missing password or an unowned renewal becomes an agreed action, not a quiet assumption |
| Prepare an update | Support lead | Review the change, test it away from the live site and confirm a backup and restore first | No recovery evidence, or a failed enquiry check, pauses the release |
| Investigate a broken enquiry form | Support lead with site owner | Check the affected path and the external email service, then agree a correction or a recovery | Lost access or an uncertain backup escalates instead of producing a promise |
Most websites still fail the speed test
Published statistic. Passing is not a high bar, and half the web still misses it. It is one of the few quality signals a competitor cannot fake.
Source: HTTP Archive: Web Almanac 2025, Performance (CrUX, July 2025). Reviewed .
Read the graphic as text
Mobile
- Pass all three: 48%. Good Largest Contentful Paint, Interaction to Next Paint and Cumulative Layout Shift at the 75th percentile of real visits
- Do not: 52%. Desktop does better at 56%, which is the version owners usually check
What we monitor, and why
First, a list of what the site depends on
Monitoring is only as good as the list underneath it. Before a care plan starts, we write down the platform and its version, the hosting, the domain and DNS, how enquiry messages are delivered, every integration, who holds each renewal and where access is missing. For backups we confirm three things: what is actually backed up, where the evidence is kept and how a restore would be tested rather than assumed.
Signals matched to what could go wrong
We group monitoring by the decision each signal supports. Availability tells you the site is reachable. Performance tells you it is usable. An enquiry-path check tells you the form is still delivering. Security events tell you something unusual happened. Backup status tells you whether recovery is possible at all. A brochure page and a live enquiry form do not need the same set, so we size it to your site.
OWASP's logging guidance supports this approach, with the caveat that it is general application-security advice rather than a design for any one site. It says monitoring and alerting should be decided early and be proportionate to the risks, and warns that a blind checklist produces so many alarms that real problems go unnoticed.
When you compare care proposals, keep four things apart: a signal being detected, an alert reaching a named person, someone investigating it, and a promise about uptime or recovery. The first three can be scoped. The fourth is a commitment, and it belongs in writing only if someone has actually agreed to it.
Five signals, five different decisions
Primary-source guidance. Alerting on everything buries the one signal that mattered, so match the set to what the site actually risks.
Source: OWASP: Logging cheat sheet. Reviewed .
Read the graphic as text
- Availability. The site is reachable at all
- Performance. Reachable, and still usable
- Enquiry path. The form is still delivering somewhere
- Security events. Something unusual happened, with a record
- Backup status. Whether recovery is possible at all
How we test an update before it goes live
The routine is deliberately ordinary. We review the change, check it against the plugins, themes, integrations and custom code in use, apply it somewhere other than the live site, confirm a backup exists first, check the pages your business depends on afterwards and record what we saw. Two things pause the whole release: a backup we cannot confirm, and a failed check on a page the business relies on.
What the WordPress documentation says about updates
WordPress is still the most common platform behind the sites we are asked to take over, and its own documentation is clear. It recommends backing up the website first, so that if there are any issues you can restore it. It describes a one-click update that works for most people and a manual process for when that fails. It warns that an upgrade replaces the files in the main installation, so changes made directly to those files are lost, and that whether a one-click update can write files depends on the server's file permissions.
That is how the platform behaves, not a description of anyone's support scope. Which of those steps your provider performs, and what they are responsible for if one goes wrong, belongs in the agreement.
What a PageSpeed score is made of
Published statistic. Four fifths of the score is decided by JavaScript work and one large element, which is why a lighter build beats a tuned heavy one.
Source: Google: Lighthouse performance scoring (Lighthouse 10 weightings). Reviewed .
Read the graphic as text
Score
- Total Blocking Time: 30%. How long the main thread was too busy to answer a tap
- Largest Contentful Paint: 25%. When the biggest element finished painting
- Cumulative Layout Shift: 25%. How much the page moved under the reader
- First Contentful Paint: 10%. When anything at all appeared
- Speed Index: 10%. How quickly the view filled in
What happens when something breaks
The order we work in
An ordinary outage and a suspected hack start the same way, then go different directions. We identify what is affected, confirm who has authority to act, preserve anything useful as evidence and check what access and recovery evidence exists. Only then can we agree a correction, an investigation or a tested restore. If access has been lost or the backups are uncertain, the honest next step is escalation, not a promise to restore.
Why logs matter, and why they need care
How much can be learned after an incident depends on the logs. OWASP, again as general advice, says a log entry should record when, where, who and what for each event, with the action attempted and its result. It also treats logs as sensitive: passwords, keys, card data and session identifiers should be removed or masked, and access to the logs should itself be recorded. So we check what is logged, and who can read it, before anyone needs to know. Logs record what the system saw; they do not prove the cause on their own.
Which changes care includes
Sorting a request before anyone prices it
Most disagreements about support are really disagreements about what kind of request something is. So we agree the categories in advance: routine care, content changes, new features, redesign work, search work and incident response. Anything that touches an integration, permissions, a renewal or a page the business depends on gets a quick impact review and your approval, however small the technical change.
A record for every request
Each request gets a short record: what it affects, the risk, who owns it, who approved it, what evidence was asked for, whether it has been released and what happens next. Routine approvals and urgent escalations are kept apart, so you can see at a glance what care has actually done.
Three ways a request is handled, and priced
Editorial framework. Most arguments about a support bill are really arguments about which of these three a request was.
Basis: Perfect Design: how websites work. Reviewed .
Read the graphic as text
- Included care. Updates, backups, monitoring and small fixes
- Priced separately. New features, redesign work, search work
- Escalated. Incidents, and anything touching an integration
Before you agree a support scope, with us or anyone
Having these ready makes the first conversation short:
- The website address and the problem you want to stop having
- Who is affected when it happens
- The platform and any outside services you know it uses
- Who holds access, and who holds each renewal
- What the site has to keep doing reliably
- Any constraint, such as a budget cycle or a regulated requirement
Then ask for the scope in writing: monitoring, backup and restore, who applies updates, which changes are included, how you are kept informed, escalation and account ownership. Check ownership first. If nobody can say who controls the domain, the hosting and the email, settle that before signing with anyone, including us.



